Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Communicative competence.. :)

Jeni D. Bayona          1POL1
 
Communicative Competence is believed to be the ultimate goal of language learning and teaching. Would standard Philippine English in one way or another, be detrimental to one’s continuing development of communicative competence? Please explain.




No and at the same time, yes. In answering this question, it is not location that needs to be considered. Instead, we should take into account who we are talking to. Since communication is the imparting or interchange of thoughts, opinions, or information by speech, writing, or signs that involves people, then they are the ones that we should actually consider and not anything else. In this way, we can determine if standard Philippine English can be really harmful in our objective of being communicatively competent.

In any situation, we are communicating with only two kinds of people, those who practice standard Philippine English or are at least exposed to it and those that observe another variety of English such as the Australian and British English. The first kind of people is those that have been exposed to standard Philippine English. They are the ones who may have grown up here in the Philippines which is the country of the language. Although it is stated that location is not the main condition by what we should consider in the situation, it is also beneficial. By this, they can be very exposed to the language itself which can greatly contribute to the proficiency of anyone in speaking the language. This is true since people around you would be using the language and familiarization will be acquired at first until learning follows. People who belong to this group are also those who may not be an actual grown-up in the country but individuals who are open to other elements of language learning such as instances when the language is practiced in the house even if the community actually doesn’t. The next group of speakers is the one where the people who belong are those who may have any idea about standard Philippine English at all. It may also include those that are foreigners since they are not exposed to this language and also those who may be Filipinos but doesn’t possess awareness about this language. All on all, they are the people who cannot express themselves in standard Philippine English.

I can straightway say that it cannot detriment to our continuing development of communicative competence if and only if the ones whom we are talking to are exposed to standard Philippine English itself. The standard Philippine English has its own terms that are not accepted or even existing in other varieties of English. Therefore, it is very important for both parties to be well-informed about this situation. If that is the case then, there would be understanding in both factions. If there is understanding then the goal of communicative competence has been reached. Why conclude it as harmful for the development when even the aim of communicative competence has already been reached? Anyway, it is understanding that matters. In this perspective, they have acquired it therefore; the usage of standard Philippine English is not a hindrance to our development only if we are communicating with people who also have the capacity to express themselves just like the way we do it through standard Philippine English.

Since we have here two situations, the next situation’s answer is yes. The next situation is where the communication attempt is between a person who has the ability to express himself through standard Philippine English and a person that is incompetent in the art of conversation by means of the language used by the first speaker. If it would be this way, then our development as a competent communicator would really be affected in an adverse fashion. We have different varieties of English and if we ever communicate with these people observing their own varieties, there would always be misunderstandings in these cases that will not be adhering to communication’s main goal which is to have over-all understanding. Although it doesn’t actually mean totally yes since we have these exceptions in our situation, there will still be terms and words by which the parties won’t agree and would eventually cause wrong ideas to those who are involved. Each variety has its own terms and these are the things that will cause the conflict. At first these may only be minor misunderstanding due to culture gasp and such, but as time goes by and as different factors affect the variance, then that would be the time that it will be concluded as a major-major discord among the bloc. With these, inconsistency from the language itself would arise. Issues questioning its credibility would keep popping up from the minds of the speakers. It will continue until it would be further regarded with negative meaning, suggesting qualms upon the minds of its speakers that will eventually affect their confidence in expressing themselves through the language.
Since understanding is the ultimate goal of language learning and teaching, then, standard Philippine English is not detrimental to one’s continuing development of communicative competence if in the situation: a speaker that has the ability to express himself in the language is conversing to someone with the same knowledge about the language, too. The goal, understanding, will not be exigent to get hold of given that they are sharing the same knowledge that is an element of understanding. And with this situation, the native speaker is self-assured that whatever he says, the receiver would convey correct information and shall not cause them fuss just because of a misinterpreted word. But, if the speaker of standard Philippine English would be talking to someone who is practicing or even an expert in another variety of English, it is the time when he gets most conscious about the way he would speak or what he would speak of. Confidence to express himself in the language that he prefers the most would be lessened and he will be obliged to use terms that he is not even comfortable with. If he already cannot be confident, then doubts would follow-up thus making him uneasy of his self-expression. It will affect his communicative competence through the way of subconsciously restraining the speaker to speak his mind the way he wanted to and warning him about disturbing events that may happen in the future due to these  caveat of committing errors that non-native speakers believe to be wrong for them yet accepted in standard Philippine English itself.

Trifles.. :)

Seat No. 5
BAYONA, JENI D.
WR : TRIFLES

Who:  The victim was John Wright, the farmer and the perpetrator was Minnie Foster, the wife of the farmer.
What: The victim was found dead.
When: He was found dead the next morning.
Where: The victim was found dead in their bedroom.
How: He was found dead with a rope slipped on his neck that strangled him to death.
My verdict is that the wife is guilty of killing his husband.
Why:

The motive of the wife, Minnie Foster, to kill his husband, John Wright, was that she had enough of the cold and cruel life that her husband has given her. Considering the fact that they do not even have any child that cotributes to the loneliness of the couple’s life, the wife was as if she already suffered enough and has endured a lot of time already with him and this terrible life should already end. In the story, before Minnie Foster met John Wright and before they have married each other, she was a singer. She had a life that was very colorful and it has all vanished after the wedding day. It was her life back then, but, Mr. Wright took it away.  Another manifestation of the fact that her husband took away her happiness is when he kiled the bird. As what Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peter said, her life before was relived by the bird. It reflected who she was and by the time of her married life, it was the only thing left for her as a memory that somehow in her past, she has lived a colourful life and that there was real happiness whenever she sings. It was all that’s left to her that reminds her of her youth, but, her own husband even took it away. And because of this, she had resorted to killing his husband since she has no life anymore. Maybe not literally, but figuratively, her life has gone with the death of the bird.

CWG reaction paper: The Big Freeze

BAYONA, JENI D
CONTEMPORARY WORLD GEOGRAPHY

1. Why is the film different in terms of its treatment of climate change when compared with other films on the topic? Explain.

The film is different in terms of its treatment of climate change when compared with other films on the topic because it doesn’t show alarmism. The way the documentary is shown, there are no traces of panic, warn and danger. It is presented in a view of calmness unlike other films of climate change which often emphasizes the coming danger and fatality that it may cause. I have already seen a lot of documentaries about climate change and such topics and these videos often give universal conclusions that if what we don’t get to be stopped, then everything would fall into end. It has been already monotony: showing that the Earth where we live is in danger, warning and blaming the people of the world that we are the ones responsible for the fact that our world is in danger, making us aware that the Earth will soon meet its end because of US. This video is different. It showed us what the effects of climate change is but in the perspective of a positive seer. They haven’t shown the usual clips in this kind of documentaries and in the end: I haven’t felt the feeling that I usually feel whenever I see these videos: the feeling of fear. It treats climate change not as a dangerous event for the world but as phenomena just like that of the normal events that happen in our world. It has given us the effects but the blame weren’t stated to be caused by the humans since blaming for the event wasn’t part of the documentation.

2. How does the role of man fall into the overall explanation regarding climate change?
Actually, if we would view this issue as a whole and as how other films would emphasize, the role of man would surely be as the greatest factor of this event. As usual, we would be the main blame for what is happening right now in our environment. In this part, we would always be the antagonists and the destroyer of the earth. But, unlike how they have shown it in the video, the climate change that we are experiencing right now was displayed as something that of natural phenomena that hap